Hillary Clinton may unravel at last, thanks to those whom she sought to influence in her family’s shady business trading government favors for private donations.
As described in this awesome little article, the Prime Minister of Bangladesh spills the beans on just one example of the (at best) unethical dealings gotten up by the Clinton family. The article is short, and fills in the details undergirding the claim that then-Secretary of State Clinton “made a personal call to pressure Bangladesh’s prime minister to aid a donor to her husband’s charitable foundation”.
While the linked article stands alone as good news for those who have long suspected the illicit quid pro quo nature of the Clinton family’s enterprises, what really makes this noteworthy for me is that this is the first shoe to drop and from an unexpected direction — resentful targets of the Clinton Global Machine’s influence-peddling. Not everybody gets the friendly phone call in the Clintons’ hard-knuckled political efforts. Somebody gets the squeeze, the “shame if something happened to your nice situation” phone call. Or meeting.
Or e-mail.
With Obama, Lynch and the swamped Comey no longer on scene to protect the Clintons (and thereby shut the door to discovery on Obama), the timing could not be better for fresh, as-yet uninvestigated claims to arise.
Hence the Dems needing a “Special Prosecutor” to bury the bodies before they smell.
Yup. All it might take to crack this thing wide open again is some of the mails sent my HRC to be disclosed by their recipients. And it won’t be about yoga.
I am particularly disturbed there has been no commentary on Chelsea’s $5 million dollar wedding that was funded by the Foundation.
I’m not sure which is more upsetting:
1. That donors paid for such a personal event? Or…
2. That anyone has the nerve to blow that kind of money on a wedding? (Pls note this remark is coming from the Queen Bee who informed my father I was not wearing anything but Vera Wang at my ceremony.)
I don’t think anyone who donated a material sum of money to that cesspool had any delusion the funds were earmarked for anything other than Clinton family luxury.
*
As far as I know, there are no Christian charities involved in extortion.
Agree.
Will this story be picked up by the MSM? Seems doubtful.
Mais non, but one of the things I like most about the Donald is that he is encouraging the nation to pay attention to criminal/unethical behavior.
I know he was truly ‘preaching to the choir’ today at Liberty University, but even I, the secular, appreciated his message!
Wasn’t it fun to see somebody allowed to speak on campus without a full-blown riot?