{"id":6237,"date":"2012-03-31T11:47:42","date_gmt":"2012-03-31T02:47:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/haakondahl.com\/blog\/?p=2705"},"modified":"2012-03-31T11:47:42","modified_gmt":"2012-03-31T02:47:42","slug":"legal-question","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/legal-question\/","title":{"rendered":"Legal Question"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[pullquote]<a href=\"http:\/\/projects.washingtonpost.com\/congress\/members\/c000705\/\" target=\"\" rel=\"noopener\">Sen. Kent Conrad<\/a>\u00a0(D-N.D.) called the CLASS Act &#8220;a Ponzi scheme of the first order&#8221; &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2009\/10\/27\/AR2009102701417.html\">WaPo 2009<\/a>[\/pullquote]If a law is made under fraudulent circumstances, is it a law? \u00a0I realize that this is ridiculously vague, and I just happen to have an example in mind &#8212; ObamaCare. \u00a0It is my understanding that (let me be brief) the <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.heritage.org\/2010\/03\/16\/obamacare-slaughter-rule-is-without-precedent\/\">Slaughter rule<\/a> was not invoked because budget-neutral reconciliation offered a way to pass the bill piecemeal, but only with the addition of the CLASS Act. \u00a0Well, the CLASS Act fell away long ago, and nobody was suroprised&#8211;it was always doomed to fail, an accounting trick designed to make the bill eligible for reconciliation rather than committee work on new bills. \u00a0Or something.<\/p>\n<p>I realize that the <a title=\"Good Write-up, with graphic\" href=\"http:\/\/directorblue.blogspot.jp\/2012\/03\/great-news-cbo-reconsiders-obamacare.html\">CBO sliding window<\/a> is probably not worth shooting at for now, at least ion this context. \u00a0But the use of reconciliation after so obvious a ruse of eligibility seems to me to cry out for remedy. \u00a0Would a judge anywhere have a leg to stand on to say that the law is invalid because (despite the accession of Congress at the time) the ex-post facto discovery of the farcical accounting in the CLASS Act puts the event of its passage in a new light?<\/p>\n<p>I say yes, that is, ObamaCare is already not a valid law. \u00a0The Supreme Court is now struggling over the law&#8217;s epitaph, not its fate.<\/p>\n<div class=\"pld-like-dislike-wrap pld-template-1\">\r\n    <div class=\"pld-like-wrap  pld-common-wrap\">\r\n    <a href=\"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/wp-login.php\" class=\"pld-like-trigger pld-like-dislike-trigger  \" title=\"\" data-post-id=\"6237\" data-trigger-type=\"like\" data-restriction=\"user\" data-already-liked=\"0\">\r\n                        <i class=\"fas fa-thumbs-up\"><\/i>\r\n                <\/a>\r\n    <span class=\"pld-like-count-wrap pld-count-wrap\">    <\/span>\r\n<\/div><div class=\"pld-dislike-wrap  pld-common-wrap\">\r\n    <a href=\"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/wp-login.php\" class=\"pld-dislike-trigger pld-like-dislike-trigger  \" title=\"\" data-post-id=\"6237\" data-trigger-type=\"dislike\" data-restriction=\"user\" data-already-liked=\"0\">\r\n                        <i class=\"fas fa-thumbs-down\"><\/i>\r\n                <\/a>\r\n    <span class=\"pld-dislike-count-wrap pld-count-wrap\"><\/span>\r\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[pullquote]<a href=\"http:\/\/projects.washingtonpost.com\/congress\/members\/c000705\/\" target=\"\" rel=\"noopener\">Sen. Kent Conrad<\/a>\u00a0(D-N.D.) called the CLASS Act &#8220;a Ponzi scheme of the first order&#8221; &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2009\/10\/27\/AR2009102701417.html\">WaPo 2009<\/a>[\/pullquote]If a law is made under fraudulent circumstances, is it a law? \u00a0I realize that this is ridiculously vague, and I just happen to have an example in mind &#8212; ObamaCare. \u00a0It is my understanding that (let me be brief) the <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.heritage.org\/2010\/03\/16\/obamacare-slaughter-rule-is-without-precedent\/\">Slaughter rule<\/a> was not invoked because budget-neutral reconciliation offered a way to pass the bill piecemeal, but only with the addition of the CLASS Act. \u00a0Well, the CLASS Act fell away long ago, and nobody was suroprised&#8211;it was always doomed to fail, an accounting trick designed to make the bill eligible for reconciliation rather than committee work on new bills. \u00a0Or something.<\/p>\n<p>I realize that the &#8230; <a href=\"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/legal-question\/\"> Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr; <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":34128,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[234,265,266,268],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-american-politics","category-supreme-court","category-tea-party","category-u-s-constitution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/34128"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6237"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6237\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balldiamondball.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}