Patterico has a series of posts tracking the impressively dishonest and wholly anti-Constitutional views being pimped by Time Magazine’s Managing Editor, Richard Stangel. Stengel was once CEO of “The National Constitution Center”, now runs their Peter Jenning Center for the Political Rectification of Obama’s Praetorian Media.
\nPatterico (in a guest post and letter campaign by Aaron Worthing) wrote to the Center with a list of specifics and detailed refutations, chapter and verse as it were. The summary of their weaselly non-answer seems to be “Buy the magazine! Click the link!”<\/p>\n
To find out whether Stengel made those claims, read his article. To learn what the Constitution says about those issues, you can find an annotated Constitution by clicking\u00a0here.<\/p>\n
So there\u2019s a lot of controversy.\u00a0 What do you think?
\nvia Patterico’s Pontifications \u00bb Day Fifteen of Stengel-gate: The National Constitution Center Ducks the Issue<\/a>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\nThis is the haughty disdain with which the National Constitution Center treats the most well-researched and important refutation yet of their socialist anti-Constitutional position. They are stonewalling criticism in an attempt to quietly squelch dissent. \u00a0 From a company, I could see it. \u00a0From the “National Constitution Center”, it is inappropriate, and a clear demonstration of the danger we face.<\/p>\n
EOF<\/p>\n
\r\n\r\n \r\n <\/i>\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/span>\r\n<\/div>\r\n \r\n <\/i>\r\n <\/a>\r\n <\/span>\r\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Patterico has a series of posts tracking the impressively dishonest and wholly anti-Constitutional views being pimped by Time Magazine’s Managing Editor, Richard Stangel. Stengel was once CEO of “The National Constitution Center”, now runs their Peter Jenning Center for the Political Rectification of Obama’s Praetorian Media.
Patterico (in a guest post and letter campaign by Aaron Worthing) wrote to the Center with a list of specifics and detailed refutations, chapter and verse as it were. The summary of their weaselly non-answer seems to be “Buy the magazine! Click the link!”<\/p>\nTo find out whether Stengel made those claims, read his article. To learn what the Constitution says about those issues, you can find an annotated Constitution by clicking\u00a0here.<\/p>\n
So there\u2019s a lot of controversy.\u00a0 What do you … Continue reading