This is an outstanding movie. If you felt ripped off by almost every recent SF movie, and insulted by almost every recent military movie, this is your huckleberry.<\/p>\n
Trailer for “Battle: Los Angeles” at IMDb<\/a><\/p>\n There are only a few clunker moments in the film, but they are isolated and not structural. This movie cashes the checks written over the past twenty years by movies struggling to deliver the grit, emotion, action, suspense, and military technical detail that movie watchers demand and have not received. I’ll flesh this out later, but for now allow me to simply give this movie my highest recommendation. You are very fortunate if viewing this movie for the first time is in your future: You are in for a treat, for this is the sort of movie “they don’t make anymore”.<\/p>\n [pullquote]This is what Full Metal Jacket could have been, if Kubrick had allowed R. Lee Ermey to re-wire the entire film[\/pullquote] Unlike Independence Day, which I staggered away from as if gut-shot, this film celebrates achievement without dredging up Bill Pullman’s mawkish and saccharine, incomprehensible portrayal of a character with no justification in the film. \u00a0When the characters are down, the audience is down, and when they are up, the audience is on its feet cheering. \u00a0The effects and the composition of CGI vehicles and such comport well with George Lucas’ decades-old guidance that the more time you spend on a scene, the less time it should stay on the screen. \u00a0There are no fighter planes literally posing for the camera as in Independence Day, and while many of the more developed shots become crowded with smoke trails and so forth, these shots are done well and help to propel the movie further. \u00a0Nowhere is the screen-full-of-crap of George Lucas’ later years, or pointless repetition of I-paid-for-it-and-I-say-it-gets-another-close-up effectsmanship.<\/p>\n The invasion itself is a masterwork, in that it unfolds rapidly, without extraneous explanation of things the characters would have no way of knowing and which the audience does not care about, and with plausible physics represented faithfully and modestly.<\/p>\n Complaints are few: you could worry about some things having one form of aerial suspension which differs from that of others, or about what a “Copperhead” is, or the biopsy McGuffin, but I give these a pass. \u00a0Partly from a “halo” effect caused by the overall great vibe spilling from this jam-packed movie, and partly because a little sleight of hand is to be expected in an alien invasion movie. \u00a0If the tricks are executed without insulting the audience, we find we don’t mind, and simply pivot off that rock to get to the next scene.<\/p>\n I cannot overstate the value of halo to this movie. \u00a0It has succeeded wildly where so many predecessors have failed that I had frankly given up on Hollywood’s capacity to get this right. \u00a0This movie gets it right on so many fronts that I gladly overlook and even come to appreciate the parts that bring to mind a bit movie-making.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n This movie cashes the checks written over the past twenty years by movies struggling to deliver the grit, emotion, action, suspense, and military technical detail that movie watchers demand and have not received. Continue reading
\nI suppose my only serious criticism is in the sacrifice\/pay-off equation, but to describe it further would give away more than I should in a booster review, which this most certainly is.<\/p>\n
\nIt is obvious that the film was made if not with the direct involvement of a whole lot of military sorts, then with a whole lot of consultation for technical detail and cultural nuance. \u00a0This is what Full Metal Jacket could have been, if Kubrick had allowed R. Lee Ermey to re-wire the entire film the way he did the metastasized boot camp section. \u00a0Themes from Heartbreak Ridge are faithfully carried out, even if compressed a bit to make room for the unveiling of the spectacular alien invasion.<\/p>\n